Budget 2025: HMRC powers

Published on:  27 November 2025
Domestic reporting of UK resident cryptoasset users under the Cryptoasset Reporting Framework

The UK is implementing CARF, the Cryptoasset Reporting Framework developed by the OECD. This will require so-called Reporting Cryptoasset service providers (RCASPs) to collect relevant tax information and undertake due diligence in respect of their users on an annual basis. The measure means that HMRC will have CARF data on all UK taxpayers using UK based RCASP, together with information from non-UK RCASP. Under existing measures, HMRC would not have had this information, as the common reporting standard (CRS) which allows tax authorities to exchange information with one another does not cover cryptoassets. The measure will be effective from Royal Assent of the Finance Bill.

Gravita’s view

This measure is widely anticipated to cause a flurry of disclosures and tax investigations as taxpayers who may not have declared all that they should have to HMRC, will now do so.

Umbrella company market: Changes to Income Tax rules to tackle non-compliance

Umbrella companies sit between the worker and an agency that then onward supplies that worker to the end user. A very typical example is a nurse, that may contract with an umbrella company that in turn contracts with an agency that works with a specific NHS Trust. The structure is seen to provide a level of flexibility for both the end user ( the NHS) and the worker, as they only need a contract with one entity, who then offers their services via the agencies that interact with the local NHS Trusts.

The current law broadly works by saying that if the worker would be treated for tax purposes as an employee, the umbrella company must tax them as such when it pays them. This is called off-payroll working (some will know it by IR35 which applies to personal service companies).

The problem is that there are a number of cases,  including a very high-profile case that is rumbling through the courts, whereby it is alleged that the umbrella company is not fulfilling its duties and withholding PAYE as it should.

The government is therefore legislating to make agents – who they believe have the control over the supply chain – and the end user, jointly and severally liable to the PAYE that should be accounted for where there is an umbrella company in the supply chain. In essence, they are moving the burden to the agency (or the end user if they have the direct relationship with the worker).

Gravita’s view

The intention of the law change is to close the tax gap by protecting against fraudulent behaviour of a small number of umbrella companies. It’s also to prevent workers facing large tax bills, and to ensure that the temporary labour market operates on a level playing field, as fraudulent operators will no longer be able to undercut their competitors.

All of these are admirable aims, and we welcome any change in law that protects against fraudulent behaviour, especially where it targets those that are on lower or middle income.

Closing in on promoters of marketed tax avoidance schemes

The government is introducing a suite of measures to continue to tackle avoidance schemes:

  • DOTAS – the penalty regime will be updated so that HMRC can directly issue penalties to taxpayers instead of seeking tribunal approval
  • DASVOIT – the penalty regime will be updated so that HMRC can directly issue penalties to promoters instead of seeking tribunal approval
  • USRs (universal stop regulations) – Regulations will be introduced enabling HMRC to issue stop notices to those promoting arrangements that have no realistic prospect of success. Failure to comply will attract sanctions including publications, financial penalties and criminal prosecutions
  • PANs (promoter action notices) – These will be issued to business that provide goods or services used in the promotion of tax avoidance schemes requiring them to stop doing so. Again, the same range of sanctions as for USRs will apply
  • AAINs (anti-avoidance information notices) – Granting HMRC the power to issue notice to compel those that HMRC reasonably believe are connected to the promotion of marketed tax avoidance schemes requesting relevant information. This will include the ability for HMRC to issue such a notice to financial institutions (having received approval from the tribunal) to obtain banking data of promoters or those connected with promoters. The same sanctions will apply for non-compliance
  • Legal professionals facilitating avoidance – this measure widens the scope of HMRC powers allowing them to publish those involved under certain circumstances
Gravita’s view

We are not knowingly involved in the promotion of avoidance schemes and therefore welcome any measures that aid HMRC to tackle those that are.

We work closely with those that have been caught up with such schemes, helping them bring their affairs up to date with HMRC. In our experience, many that have been involved, have done so without fully grasping what they are being caught up in, and have been fearful of coming clean.  By approaching HMRC in the right way, those that we have acted for often get a far better result than if HMRC have caught up with them. The measures now being introduced make that much more likely and so we would urge anyone who has been involved in such schemes to work with your advisors to bring the matter to the attention of HMRC.

Tackling tax adviser facilitated non-compliance by enhancing HMRC’s powers

Further measures are being introduced to target and tackle tax advisors that deliberately facilitate non-compliance of their clients’ tax affairs.

The changes build on legislation introduced in 2012 as a result of consultation. The measures include:

  • Allowing HMRC to obtain information from tax advisors using a file access notice where there is reasonable suspicion that they have deliberately facilitated non-compliance in their clients’ tax affairs
  • Removing the requirement for tribunal approval before issuing a file access notice, replacing it with a senior HMRC officer approval mechanism, where a file access notice is approved by HMRC it will be appealable to the tribunal
  • Revising the penalties for failure to comply with a file access notice to include where inaccurate information is provided, and allowing HMRC to increase the penalty amounts with tribunal approval
  • Introducing a new penalty framework to sanction tax advisers who are found to have deliberately facilitated non-compliance in their clients’ tax affairs
  • Introducing new powers to publish information about tax advisers where HMRC has used relevant sanctions
Gravita’s view

We, along with all the professionals that we work with, work incredibly hard to not just understand the law (all 21,000 pages of it) but then explain how that law works to a client who often only comes across it once in their lifetime. With new law, there is often a great deal of debate on its application, and we are required to interpret it as best we can, using all the tools that are available to us.

It is therefore welcomed by those of us that provide high levels of professional services to clients that HMRC is introducing such measures to tackle those that do not.

Tackling Construction Industry Scheme fraud

Measures will be introduced to:

  1. Provide for the immediate cancellation of Gross Payment Status (GPS)
  2. Make the business who entered into the transaction connected to fraud liable for the lost tax
  3. Allow a penalty of 30% of the lost tax to be charged to the business found liable, as well as to its directors and other persons connected to the business

The time limit for reapplication where GPS has been immediately removed is also increased from one year to five years.

Loan charge independent review

HMRC will establish a new loan charge settlement scheme, which is aimed at giving those using historic disguised remuneration schemes a chance to bring their tax affairs up to date with more favourable terms. This measure will take retrospective effect from 5th April 2019.

Gravita’s view

For a long time, the loan charge has been a controversial issue, having left those who were involved in this sort of planning (often unwittingly) in hardship.

Since 2016 successive governments have tried to collect the tax from those individuals. Under the proposals, the way the tax will be calculated should leave those affected with significantly lower liabilities than under previous attempts to recover the tax, with estimates in the press suggesting that up to a third of those affected may have no liabilities at all. The government are keen to draw a line under this once and for all, and as can be seen to the related announcements about Umbrella companies, they are keen to make sure it does not happen again.

calendar
calendar
Displaying results
Clear all filters
No results found.

Loading...

Similar Insights

Spring Forecast 2026: Analysis

3rd March 2026
Written by: Michaela Lamb
Unlike recent fiscal events, the 2026 Spring Forecast was largely expected to be a non-event, with most predicting that the Chancellor would not be able to make further changes to either tax or spending following...
link to Find Out More

Budget 2025: Employment taxes

27th November 2025
 
Salary Sacrifice pensions The government will charge employer and employee National Insurance (NI) on pension contributions above £2,000 per annum made via salary sacrifice. This will take effect from 6th April 2029. In a salary...
link to Find Out More

Budget 2025: Savings and investments

27th November 2025
 
ISAs The annual ISA limit of £20,000 remains unchanged, but the way in which you can save is not. From April 2027, the cash ISA limit will be cut from £20,000 to £12,000 (unless you...
link to Find Out More

Sign up to Gravita's latest updates and newsletters

Stay up-to-date with our event invites, latest news and updates, straight from Gravita's experts.